« | Home | Categories | »

Nick Goepper breaks down his winning slopestyle tricks

Posted on March 9th, 2014 at 21:42 by Paul Jay in category: News

Write a comment

Weirdest Snowden leak yet: The NSA has an advice columnist

Posted on March 9th, 2014 at 20:52 by John Sinteur in category: News


Trust, it seems, is an issue on many levels with the NSA.

Write a comment


  1. No, the weirdest leak would be for Mr. S. to have been sponsored by a dissident group inside the Secret Administration who have sent him to blow the whistle on the corruption and misspending that they fear will ruin our civilization.


Posted on March 9th, 2014 at 15:49 by John Sinteur in category: News


Michele Bachmann told CPAC attendees today that the conservative movement must fight back because it is “at its core is an intellectual movement”

Write a comment


  1. True dat.

A Hole in Mars

Posted on March 9th, 2014 at 15:17 by John Sinteur in category: Great Picture



What created this unusual hole in Mars?

The hole was discovered by chance in 2011 on images of the dusty slopes of Mars’ Pavonis Mons volcano taken by the HiRISE instrument aboard the robotic Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter currently circling Mars. The hole appears to be an opening to an underground cavern, partly illuminated on the image right. Analysis of this and follow-up images revealed the opening to be about 35 meters across, while the interior shadow angle indicates that the underlying cavern is roughly 20 meters deep. Why there is a circular crater surrounding this hole remains a topic of speculation, as is the full extent of the underlying cavern. Holes such as this are of particular interest because their interior caves are relatively protected from the harsh surface of Mars, making them relatively good candidates to contain Martian life. These pits are therefore prime targets for possible future spacecraft, robots, and even human interplanetary explorers.

Write a comment


  1. The hole is the CPAC core mentioned in the article above

La contestata pubblicità del David col fucile

Posted on March 9th, 2014 at 15:10 by John Sinteur in category: If you're in marketing, kill yourself



Venerdì 7 marzo il settimanale l’Espresso ha pubblicato le immagini di una campagna pubblicitaria dell’azienda americana produttrice di armi ArmaLite. Nelle immagini si vede un fotomontaggio del David di Michelangelo che stringe in mano un fucile prodotto dall’azienda. Sotto, una scritta definisce l’arma “un’opera d’arte”. L’immagine è stata pubblicata da alcune riviste specializzate americane, come Rifle Firepower. Nonostante questa diffusione decisamente limitata, nelle ultime ore ci sono state critiche molto forti alla campagna da parte del mondo politico e della tutela dei beni artistici italiani.

Write a comment


  1. Rough translation – On Friday, March 7th, the weekly L’Espresso has published pictures of an advertising campaign from the American arms manufacturing ArmaLite. In the pictures you can see a montage of Michelangelo’s David clutching a rifle manufactured by the company. Below, an inscription defines the weapon “work of art”. The image has been published inseveral journals such as American Rifle Firepower. Although the ad distributions thus far has been quite limited, in the last hour, there have been strong criticisms of the campaign from political officials and from those concerned protection of Italian artistic heritage.

    If your in marketing – use these weapons to kill yourself – please!

  2. The problem is what?

  3. @Desiato: Oh come on! The gun is bigger than the dick, surely.

  4. Huh?

  5. @Desiato The problem is using our artistic heritage for such an insidious marketing campaign. The problem is associating David with death, destruction and the carnage of war – to name a copuple of reasons. I would rather is a million of these http://pastelninja.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/david.jpg than just one of the ArmaLite death machines. Quando questa bestia è morta, così fa anche il veleno!

  6. From what I’ve read, David should be associated with death, destruction and war.

  7. [Quote]:

    The statue represents the Biblical hero David,

  8. Oh dear, our precious artistic heritage! It will be sullied by use in advertising! After seeing that ad, we’ll never be able to appreciate a nice statue of David again!

    Sorry for the sarcasm, but really… is there any impact on the artistic heritage? Isn’t that the kind of thinking we decry on this blog when Disney feels they need longer copyright to keep others from remixing Mickey, or when someone’s fanfic gets taken down by an author protecting their precious IP?

  9. I don’t see this whole episode as “oh dear our precious heritage” but rather as a “gee, what a bunch of uncultured barbarians trying to sell stuff this way”

  10. OTOH equipping him with a gun rather than a sling makes sense of the fact that he is, for his size, quite poorly endowed.

  11. @Desiato – Not at all…. and equating / Disney Mickey Mouse with the likes of Michelangelo, Wow, that is telling. So I leave you with this: What would I prefer my children’s first introduction to Michelangelo: his real work or ArmaLites’s? The real work of course and if you have children, or search your memory, you will know the process about which I speak. I want my children to know history, including art history, at the source – not a distorted comic (or violent) image produced by some marketing department with an a collective IQ in the negative numbers.

    @John – barbarians indeed!

  12. So Michelangelo made spectacular classic art that is so good that it can’t withstand being remixed into some tacky modern context?

    I don’t follow that. It’s a great statue and always will be a great statue. If the ad diminishes the statue, I think the problem is in your head.

    Alternate perspective: who gets to decide what material is so special that it can’t be desecrated? You? Or muslims who get mad at irreverent depictions on their prophet? I mean, sure, you’re not threatening to kill anyone so it’s not in the same ballpark, but why should either of you get to decide?

  13. @porpentine: That’s what I meant to say 🙂

    @Mykolas: the only place that your children are likely to see this ad is in a magazine for guns’n’ammo or on some shrill blog that likes to expose the folly and banruptcy of the world…er…

  14. oh crap..

  15. @SueW – John answered the shrill comment and it was not limited to gun mags. It was all over the media.

    @Desiato – Sidestepping the validity or not of problems in my head, the fact that Armalite included the tagline “a work of art” distorts its intent and makes it disingenuous at best. It is not art. It is a commercial offer to sell merchandise. As such, it is not unique as there are many precedents. What makes it unique, in my mind or head as you say, is the theme of extreme violence, promotion and glorification of the sick and bankrupt U.S. gun culture, and, if Dario Franceschini, Italy’s culture minister, is correct, it “… infringes the law.”

    To be clear, I was not advocating new legislation, just complete social disdain. Moreover, the issue is not desecration. Please, control your leaps to religious analogy. You said “you’re not threatening to kill anyone so it’s not in the same ballpark” – my rejoinder is: promotion of the gun culture, promotion of violence as the way to solve all problems – are all threats to me, my family, and to civilized societies everywhere. Using your logic, then bans on tobacco advertizing and anti smoking campaigns should be rescinded.

    Hope that was shrill enough 🙂

  16. I see a lot of assumptions about each others point of view in this thread, so I am leaving this here.

  17. I’ll readily agree with you that the US gun culture is nutty, and I loathe a lot of advertising. I just find this ad (run in a gun magazine as you originally said) completely unremarkable and find the use of Michelangelo’s David completely unproblematic. By no means does this extrapolate to making tobacco advertising OK. If we decide as a society that ads for guns are not OK, that’s fine with me. We haven’t done so.

  18. @Mykolas: I see shrill as being a good thing. If we don’t react to such rubbish with either ruthless mockery or indignant squawking then we are just “comfortably numb”, surely?

    In essence the ad made the leap into the “outraged liberal” media (which is why it was “all over the web”, I assume, with deference to xkcd). This must have been part of the original objective. Gun culture is boastful and unapologetic. There’s nothing they like more than ruffling feathers 🙂

    @Desiato: I don’t think that gun culture is nutty, exactly. It has a deliberate purpose and it definitely speaks to a significant minority tribe of Americans.

  19. @SueW @Desiato – great banter on this thread. See you all on the next one! 🙂


Posted on March 9th, 2014 at 11:08 by John Sinteur in category: Funny!


Write a comment


  1. I bet he’s releaved.


Posted on March 9th, 2014 at 10:26 by John Sinteur in category: News

Write a comment