« | Home | Categories | »

On the Prospect of Blackmail by the NSA

Posted on January 4th, 2014 at 16:19 by John Sinteur in category: News -- Write a comment


Sometimes when I hear public officials speaking out in defense of NSA spying, I can’t help thinking, even if just for a moment, “what if the NSA has something on that person and that’s why he or she is saying this?”

Of course it’s natural, when people disagree with you, to at least briefly think, “they couldn’t possibly really believe that, there must be some outside power forcing them to take that position.” Mostly I do not believe that anything like that is now going on.

But I cannot be 100% sure, and therein lies the problem. The breadth of the NSA’s newly revealed capabilities makes the emergence of such suspicions in our society inevitable. Especially given that we are far, far away from having the kinds of oversight mechanisms in place that would provide ironclad assurance that these vast powers won’t be abused. And that highlights the highly corrosive nature of allowing the NSA such powers. Everyone has dark suspicions about their political opponents from time to time, and Americans are highly distrustful of government in general. When there is any opening at all for members of the public to suspect that officials from the legislative and judicial branches could be vulnerable to leverage from secretive agencies within the executive branch—and when those officials can even suspect they might be subject to leverage—that is a serious problem for our democracy.

  1. John, unless law requires it, it would be good to remove the requirement to provide an email address.

    That said, I have been suspicious about the compromise of politicians ever since Obama, while still a US Senator from Illinois, reversed his pointed stand against FISA and voted for it anyway. To say that his answer to me why he so radically changed his stance (I was a constituent) was a serious prevarication, is an understatement. I voted for him as POTUS twice, but only because the alternatives were, in my mind at the time, were worse… Now, I’m not so sure.

  2. And yes, I think “prevarication” is the correct term – I think he was lying through his teeth. 🙁

  3. took out the email requirement for posting – let’s see if the anti-spam is string enough without it

  4. Re. email requirement

    Thanks. I wasn’t sure if it was a legal requirement in your domain, or an anti-spam thing.


  5. Ok. Testing no mail address now. No further messages in this thread from me about this should be considered as “it works”.

  6. Ok. I lied… It works! Thanks.

  7. It always worked with a bogus email address.

previous post: The Most Mind-Blowing Space Photos of 2013

next post: NSA Doesn’t Deny That It’s Spying On Congress