« | Home | Categories | »

In malpractice case, Catholic hospital argues fetuses aren’t people

Posted on January 24th, 2013 at 1:44 by John Sinteur in category: Pastafarian News -- Write a comment


Lori Stodghill was 31-years old, seven-months pregnant with twin boys and feeling sick when she arrived at St. Thomas More hospital in Cañon City on New Year’s Day 2006. She was vomiting and short of breath and she passed out as she was being wheeled into an examination room. Medical staff tried to resuscitate her but, as became clear only later, a main artery feeding her lungs was clogged and the clog led to a massive heart attack. Stodghill’s obstetrician, Dr. Pelham Staples, who also happened to be the obstetrician on call for emergencies that night, never answered a page. His patient died at the hospital less than an hour after she arrived and her twins died in her womb.


But when it came to mounting a defense in the Stodghill case, Catholic Health’s lawyers effectively turned the Church directives on their head. Catholic organizations have for decades fought to change federal and state laws that fail to protect “unborn persons,” and Catholic Health’s lawyers in this case had the chance to set precedent bolstering anti-abortion legal arguments. Instead, they are arguing state law protects doctors from liability concerning unborn fetuses on grounds that those fetuses are not persons with legal rights.

So life needs protection from conception (and thus we can’t have abortion) except when it costs the church money?

  1. Straight from the department of hypocracy department…

  2. Hypocracy = rule by the low. Sounds about right.

previous post: NIH told to retire most research chimpanzees

next post: Record quarter, so better dump that stock!