« | Home | Categories | »

A Minimum Tax for the Wealthy

Posted on November 27th, 2012 at 15:59 by Sueyourdeveloper in category: News -- Write a comment


SUPPOSE that an investor you admire and trust comes to you with an investment idea. “This is a good one,” he says enthusiastically. “I’m in it, and I think you should be, too.”

Would your reply possibly be this? “Well, it all depends on what my tax rate will be on the gain you’re saying we’re going to make. If the taxes are too high, I would rather leave the money in my savings account, earning a quarter of 1 percent.” Only in Grover Norquist’s imagination does such a response exist.

Between 1951 and 1954, when the capital gains rate was 25 percent and marginal rates on dividends reached 91 percent in extreme cases, I sold securities and did pretty well. In the years from 1956 to 1969, the top marginal rate fell modestly, but was still a lofty 70 percent — and the tax rate on capital gains inched up to 27.5 percent. I was managing funds for investors then. Never did anyone mention taxes as a reason to forgo an investment opportunity that I offered.

Under those burdensome rates, moreover, both employment and the gross domestic product (a measure of the nation’s economic output) increased at a rapid clip. The middle class and the rich alike gained ground.

So let’s forget about the rich and ultrarich going on strike and stuffing their ample funds under their mattresses if — gasp — capital gains rates and ordinary income rates are increased. The ultrarich, including me, will forever pursue investment opportunities.

Another fine American. Why are they all so old?


  1. We’re not ALL old. 🙂

  2. You’re not all rich or clever either 🙂

  3. +1 for Sue in the first round. *ding ding*

  4. I want a recount. Nobody said anything about rich or clever. Fine was the word. 🙂

  5. Spoken like a gentleman!

  6. I wouldn’t go that far, Sue. 🙂

previous post: Medical transplant pioneer dies in US

next post: Has Wal-Mart been good or bad?